The issue of Government surveillance came about when a man
named Edward Snowden issued a news paper article accusing the government of
going against the fourth amendment from the Constitution of the United States.
He accused the government on secretly surveying innocent peoples lives based
off of their social media lives and what they put on the Internet. People view
this two different ways, that of which it is a good thing to eliminate any
possible threat of terrorists, or that of an invasion of privacy on their
personal lives. The safety issue is a very strong argument since technology is
a very big way of communication the government could potentially intercept any
possible threats of terrorist or any threat to the citizens of the United
States. But then again it is an issue of invading privacy. People use social
media such as Facebook and twitter to express their personal beliefs and
interests. Now is it to much that intelligence agencies can thrive off of these
websites by surveying people without them even knowing they are being watched.
Now is there a happy medium? Can the government keep a close eye on people who
set off red flags on things the post or recent purchases? This is a strong
debate and people swing both ways of this argument. But personally I think that
it is to much of invasion of privacy that the government is able to watch over
anyone at any given time without them knowing.
No comments:
Post a Comment